Fieldwork / Order Guard
Interactive concept · synthetic data

One order.
One purchase event.

Try the clicks that inflate conversion reports. Compare an unguarded flow with an order-ID guard, side by side.

01 / Try to break it

A fictional checkout

A $30 sample order is ready. Submit it, repeat the submission, or revisit the confirmation.

The refresh button simulates a confirmation revisit. A real browser reload also preserves this tab's demonstration state.

02 / Guarded result

Count the order, not the clicks.

0unique orders
0simulated Purchase events
Without guards: 0 orders / 0 events0 repeats prevented
    What this proves — and what production needs

    This is an independent, AI-assisted engineering demonstration, not a deployed WordPress/GTM integration or a previous client result. It sends no requests to Meta and processes no payments. Counters describe the local simulation only.

    Two separate controls matter: a stable checkout token prevents repeat submissions from creating another order; a confirmed order ID prevents a confirmation revisit from emitting another Purchase event. A new checkout gets a new token and must still count normally.

    Here, a ledger is simulated in browser session storage. Production needs server-enforced idempotency with an atomic uniqueness constraint, verified order state, a defined conversion point, and delivery/retry handling. Browser storage alone cannot guarantee deduplication across devices, cleared storage, or concurrent requests. Meta browser/server deduplication is a separate configuration concern.

    For WordPress, the exact hooks depend on the form/plugin and checkout type. Test with GTM Preview and Meta Test Events, check existing tracking sources, and validate repeated submissions, reloads, Back navigation and genuinely new orders before publishing.

    Inspect the source and test cases